First of all, the reader has to know what the Hayden syndrome (named after the U.S. First Lady) is. The millions who contracted the paralyzing variety of the flu lie in a carriage totally immobile but still have an active brain. They are known as the Haydens and need a caregiver to take care of their bodies. The Haydens can take on a pilotable robotic body (also known as a threep) or use an integrator (a real human) to occasionally move about and communicate. A integrator is a person who had a neural network put in his/her brain so they can let a Hayden ‘borrow’ their body for awhile. The integrators are licensed and regulated practitioners who can not be forced by a Hayden to do something they don’t want to do. A Hayden needs to be somewhat wealthy to afford a robotic body by the Sebring-Warner Company. Despite the Haydens being paralyzed, they are considered another class of citizen whether they are in their carriage, in a robot, or in an integrator’s body. Far out, right? The government has spent 300 billion in research to help find a cure for the Hayden victims. Now a recently enacted law (the Abrams-Kettering Act) has curtailed the Hayden research causing bitter reactions from the Hayden community. How can anybody come up with this surreal storyline? Scalzi can.
The story starts twenty five years after the flu commenced. Chris Shane (the narrator of the story) is a Hayden in a robotic body. His father is a Hall of Fame basketball player and now running for the Senate from the state of Virginia. Chris is on his first day as an FBI agent solely investigating crimes involving Haydens. His veteran FBI partner is Leslie Vann who was previously an integrator. They get a report that someone just threw a love seat out of a window from a room in the Watergate Hotel. They go to room 714 and find a dead body on the floor with his throat cut. Local police have already subdued the man that was sitting on the bed in the room and sent him to the precinct. The alleged killer is Nicholas Bell, a licensed integrator. Apparently the dead man was using Bell’s body and was killed by Bell. Or did he commit suicide? Or was he killed by someone else, or was someone else using Bell’s body and killed the man? Or did someone invent a new type of neural network? Very confusing. Shane and Vann go downtown to interview Bell and take over the case. Bell says that he doesn’t think he killed anyone and doesn’t know why he was tased by the local police while he was sitting on the bed with his hands up.
Bell’s lawyer, Samuel Schwartz (also a Hayden in a robotic body) shows up and is distressed by the way his client has been treated. Schwartz tells the FBI agents that Bell was integrated at the time of the murder. Schwartz argues that Bell didn’t murder anyone, it was his client who did it. Schwartz tells the FBI agents that Bell can’t tell them who the client was that was using his body because it’s a integrator-client privilege. He says, “Like attorney-client privilege, or doctor-patient privilege, or confessor-parishioner privilege, and I’m not going to argue it, since the courts have already done so, and have affirmed, consistently, that integrator-client confidentiality is real and protected.” They have to let Bell go for the time being. By the way don’t think that I’m giving the story away because I’m only up to page 40. The ensuing chapters enlighten the reader regarding who the murdered man was and why he was there, how big business (concerning the Hayden people only) was involved and who murdered the man and why. So basically the story started hot in the beginning, cooled somewhat in the middle, then grew blazing hot to the conclusion. I liked the story and love the way John Scalzi writes. I highly recommend this novel.
RATING: 5 out of 5 stars
Comment: Don’t you just love books involving robots or androids? Well Scalzi’s novel took me to a different level or element of robotics. Imagine a paralyzed person living a normal life in a robot’s body...even if the robot is destroyed, the brain just goes into a new droid body. As long as the caregiver or nurse takes care of your body, you are free to go about your business.
One of my favorite novels pertaining to robots is Dan Simmons’ Ilium. It’s the wacky story of The Iliad being told in an alternate history form on Earth and Mars. It tells the story of resurrected 20th century Homer scholar Hockenberry comparing the real Trojan War to the one being reenacted on Mars. Also included in the story are the Greek Gods and Moravec robots from Jupiter heading to the scene of the play after they notice all the commotion on the two planets. It was a trip reading that novel!
But the robot novel generally considered to be the best ever written is Isaac Asimov’s I, Robot. It’s a brilliant collection of nine short stories that informs the reader what a relationship between robots and humans should ideally be like. The novel was made into a movie starring Will Smith in 2004.
The book reveals Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics. Now would you like to see them? Of course you would, so here they are:
- A robot may not injure a human being or allow a human to come to harm.
- A robot must obey orders given it by humans except where such orders would conflict with the first law.
- A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the first or second law.
No comments:
Post a Comment